Avulsão de dentes permanentes e seu manejo: conhecimento de estudantesde Odontologia, Medicina e Enfermagem / Avulsion of permanent teeth and their management: knowledge of students of Dentistry, Medicine and Nursing students

O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar o conhecimento de estudantesdos cursos da área da saúde (Odontologia, Medicina e Enfermagem) de uma instituição pública de ensino superior sobre avulsão de dentes permanentes, bem como sobre as condutas de urgência a serem tomadas frente à lesão. Foram coletadas informações, por meio de um questionário estruturado autoaplicável, sobre dados pessoais, experiências anteriores, conhecimento sobre avulsão dentária e sobre as principais condutas a serem tomadas frente a este tipo de traumatismo. Foi realizada análise descritiva e análise estatística, utilizando o teste de Qui-quadrado de Pearson. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5% (p<0,05). A amostra, selecionada por conveniência, foi composta por 390 acadêmicos daUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, sendo 154 do curso de Odontologia, 93 de Enfermagem e 143 de Medicina. Menos da metade dos entrevistados relataram ter recebidoanteriormentealguma informação sobre traumatismos dentoalveolares, sendo que a maioria que recebeu informação era do curso de Odontologia (p<0,01). A maioria também não teve nenhuma experiência anterior com esse tipo de traumatismo, sem diferença entre os cursos (p≥0,05). O estudo revelou que há falta de conhecimento sobre o manejo da avulsão de dentes permanentes pelos estudantesavaliados, principalmente os dos cursos de Medicina e Enfermagem. Desta forma, existegrande necessidade dodesenvolvimento de programas de educação, informação e treinamento, que enfatizem o tratamento emergencial para avulsão dentária, dirigidos aos alunos desses cursos (AU).

The aimof the present study was to evaluate the knowledge of undergraduate students ofhealth care courses (dentistry, medicine and nursing) from a public higher education institution about theavulsion of permanent teeth, as well as on emergency procedures to be taken in the occurrenceof this type of injury. Information was collected through self-administered structured questionnairecontainingpersonal data, previous experiences, knowledge about dental avulsion and about the main proceduresto be taken in the occurrenceof this type of trauma. Descriptive and statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square test. The significance level adopted was 5% (p <0.05). The sample, selected for convenience, was composed of 390 students from the Federal University of Juiz de Fora, 154 of them dentistrystudents,93 nursing studentsand 143 medicinestudents. Less than half of interviewees reported having previously received anyinformation about dentoalveolar trauma, and the majority who received some information were dentistrystudents (p <0.01). The majority also had no previous experience with this type of trauma, with no difference between courses (p≥0.05). The study revealed that there is lack of knowledge about the management of avulsion of permanent teeth by evaluatedstudents, especially those enrolled in medicine and nursing courses. Thus, there is great need for the development of education, information and training programs emphasizingthe emergency treatment for dental avulsion aimed at students of these courses (AU).

Biosafety in Dental Practices Versus COVID-19 Outbreak

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the dentists' knowledge about biosafety considering the SARS-CoV-2 and the risks of increasing the COVID-19 outbreak by dental practices during the pandemic in Brazil. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed by internet-based snowball sampling technique. A questionnaire with questions about different content was applied, and then analyzed the following two parameters: participants' Brazilian region and professional's specialty. Results: A total of 413 e-questionnaires from all Brazilian regions were considered valid. There were no significant differences among biosafety measures adopted by participants from different Brazilian regions (p≥0.05), except for those from North region, which have applied less previous oral antisepsis, temperature screening, and specific anamnesis tracking COVID-19 symptoms (p<0.05). The unique use of N95 mask was positively associated with North region (p<0.05). Expert participants of Groups 2 (oral surgery and correlate areas) and 4 (orthodontics, oral radiology and facial jaw orthopedics) were more updated than other ones (p<0.05). Conclusion: The biosafety protocols applied by participants were not adequate for the epidemiologic status of COVID-19 in each region of Brazil, from 13th May to 17th June 2020. Specialties linked to microbiology area or structured social networks have better applied preventive measures for COVID-19.

The Novel Coronavirus: An Alert for Pacifiers' Disinfection

Objective: To evaluate the best strategy for pacifier disinfection methods. Material and Methods: The literature search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to find all relevant articles published over the past 20 years, based on PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers extracted data independently by using a standardized form. The following factors were recorded: country of study, type of study, pacifier material, sample number, microorganisms analyzed, decontamination methods used, method accessibility and results found. Results: A total of 121 articles were obtained from all databases. The selected documents underwent a final screening, resulting in 8 articles. The method of disinfection analyzed by the literature were: 3.5% neutral detergent, apple cider vinegar 70% spray, boiling water during 15 minutes, sodium hypochlorite 2.5, hydrogen peroxide 70% spray, chlorhexidine 0.12%, Brushtox®, sterile water and microwave. Conclusion: Because of the broad methods for pacifier disinfection and different levels of accessibility to disinfectant agents, the pacifier consensus for decontamination remains unclear. Although the disinfection methods are diverse, the methods suggested to its disinfection were identified and described in this article.

The Novel Coronavirus: An Alert for Pacifiers' Disinfection

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the best strategy for pacifier disinfection methods. Material and Methods: The literature search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to find all relevant articles published over the past 20 years, based on PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers extracted data independently by using a standardized form. The following factors were recorded: country of study, type of study, pacifier material, sample number, microorganisms analyzed, decontamination methods used, method accessibility and results found. Results: A total of 121 articles were obtained from all databases. The selected documents underwent a final screening, resulting in 8 articles. The method of disinfection analyzed by the literature were: 3.5% neutral detergent, apple cider vinegar 70% spray, boiling water during 15 minutes, sodium hypochlorite 2.5, hydrogen peroxide 70% spray, chlorhexidine 0.12%, Brushtox®, sterile water and microwave. Conclusion: Because of the broad methods for pacifier disinfection and different levels of accessibility to disinfectant agents, the pacifier consensus for decontamination remains unclear. Although the disinfection methods are diverse, the methods suggested to its disinfection were identified and described in this article.